Communication skills selection criteria examples
Four full responses to communication criteria: an executive brief, a negotiation with 38 shopkeepers, plain-language health advice and a tense phone call. Plus how to split “written and verbal” and map the skill to the NSW and APS frameworks.
Updated October 2026. Sources are listed at the end.
Split the criterion into its parts
“Communication skills” is rarely one criterion. South Australia’s public sector guidance treats written and interpersonal or verbal communication as separate criteria, and Western Australia’s warns that many criteria have several parts, each needing an answer. Find evidence for every part the criterion names:
- Written: briefs, reports, letters, web content. Name the document, the reader and its purpose.
- Verbal: calls, meetings, presentations. Say who was listening and what they needed to do.
- Interpersonal: listening, rapport and tense one-to-one conversations.
- Negotiation: agreement with someone whose interests differ from yours. Show their position too.
- Liaison and consultation: working relationships with stakeholders over time.
Read the qualifier
The University of Queensland’s careers guide explains that “demonstrated” or “proven” means giving examples from your own experience, and “high level” means being experienced and able to show it. In practice “excellent” and “highly developed” are read the same way: they call for an example with some difficulty in it, such as a hard audience or a strict limit.
How it maps to the NSW and APS frameworks
In the NSW Public Sector Capability Framework (version 3, 2026) this is Communicate effectively: “Communicate clearly, pay attention to others and respond with understanding and respect”. Negotiation is a separate capability, Influence and negotiate. The writing indicators show the bar rising: logical and easy to follow at Foundational, clear and concise in a range of styles and formats at Adept, and persuasive as well at Advanced.
In the APS Integrated Leadership System the cluster is Communicates with influence: communicates clearly; listens, understands and adapts to audience; and negotiates confidently. APS 4 indicators include limiting jargon and checking that your own views have been understood. APS 6 adds selecting the appropriate medium and presenting persuasive counter-arguments.
Write to the audience, including the panel
The Australian Government Style Manual’s plain language guide asks what your readers need to know and do. It recommends putting the most important thing first, using everyday words and active voice, and averaging 15 words per sentence with none over 25. Apply it to the response itself: the University of Queensland notes that written responses show your communication skills.
Criteria you’ll see
- Excellent written and verbal communication skills Two criteria in one: give a written example and a verbal one.
- Highly developed written communication skills, including the ability to prepare briefs, reports and correspondence Use one of the documents named, with its reader and its result.
- Well developed oral and written communication skills and an ability to liaise effectively with a wide range of staff and students From a university’s list of examples. Three parts: oral, written and liaison.
- Excellent interpersonal and communication skills, including the ability to consult, negotiate and liaise effectively with a diverse range of people The negotiation part needs an example where interests differed.
- Demonstrated ability to communicate complex information to a range of audiences Show complex content made clear for a non-expert audience.
4 communication skills selection criteria examples
Made-up applicants, employers and numbers, to show the shape of a strong response. Yours should use your own experience.
Highly developed written communication skills, including the ability to prepare briefs, reports and correspondence for senior executives
As a senior policy officer at the Department of Transport and Regional Roads, I write the briefs and correspondence that executives and the Minister’s office use to make decisions.
In February 2026 the Deputy Secretary needed a two-page decision brief on whether to extend an on-demand bus trial in three regional towns. The consultants’ evaluation was 74 pages of technical writing, and the brief was due in four days.
I pulled out the three facts the decision turned on: cost per trip, the patronage trend and who was using the service. I put the recommendation and the decision needed in the first paragraph, then gave one short section each to the evidence, the cost, the risks and the three options. I turned 12 data tables into one table comparing the towns and moved the method to an attachment. After checking every figure with the evaluation team and the finance branch, I asked a colleague who knew nothing about the trial to tell me what decision the draft was seeking. Their answer showed one option was unclear, so I rewrote it.
My director and executive director cleared the brief without changes, the Deputy Secretary approved a 12-month extension in two towns, and the brief is now the model in our branch’s writing training.
- It shows what a brief demands: finding what matters, leading with the decision, fitting a strict limit.
- Testing the draft on a cold reader shows writing for the audience.
- Clearance without changes is a result a panel can weigh.
Demonstrated ability to communicate, consult and negotiate effectively with a diverse range of stakeholders
As a project officer at Calloway City Council, I present projects to the community and negotiate with the people they affect.
In 2025 I led communication on a $2.4 million footpath upgrade along a shopping strip with 38 small businesses. The contractor’s plan closed each block for three weeks, and at the first information session traders said it would ruin their Christmas trade.
Over two weeks I visited every business, asked about their busiest days and hours, and logged their concerns. Three patterns emerged: cafes needed lunchtime foot traffic, two shops took deliveries before 9 am, and nearly everyone needed December left alone. I took these to the contractor and our engineer and negotiated a new sequence: two-week closures, temporary ramps to keep doorways open, no work from 1 December to 10 January, and night work for the noisiest stage. I presented the new program at a second session with a large map showing each block’s dates, and sent a weekly two-line text update.
The works finished within budget and a week later than planned. We received four complaints, compared with 27 on a similar project the year before, and the traders’ association wrote to council supporting the next stage.
- It covers the three parts of the criterion: consulting, negotiating and communicating.
- The applicant listens before proposing anything, then shows the traders how they shaped the result.
- The comparison with a similar project gives the complaint figure meaning.
Ability to write clear, plain-language information for the public and adapt communication for diverse audiences
Writing health information people can understand and act on is the core of my role as health promotion officer at the Upper Darran Public Health Unit.
Before summer 2025 I was asked to update our heatwave fact sheet. It ran to four pages and opened with the physiology of heat stress, and local GPs said their older patients and Vietnamese- and Arabic-speaking communities hadn’t understood it.
I started with what readers needed to do: keep cool, drink water, check on others and know the danger signs. I rewrote the sheet as one double-sided page under those four headings, kept sentences to an average of under 15 words, and replaced medical terms with everyday words. I tested the draft with a seniors’ group and, through an interpreter, a Vietnamese women’s group, then added a picture of the danger signs and a large-print phone number in response to their feedback. I briefed the translators to keep the plain style and recorded a two-minute segment for community radio.
We distributed 9,000 copies through GPs, pharmacies and community groups. In a follow-up survey of 120 residents, 71 per cent could name at least three of the four actions, up from 34 per cent the year before.
- It starts with what readers need to do, the first step in the Australian Government’s plain language guidance.
- Testing with each audience shows adapting for diversity in practice.
- The survey measures understanding, not just distribution.
Well-developed interpersonal skills, including the ability to manage difficult conversations with tact and sensitivity
As an APS 4 compliance officer at a Commonwealth regulator, I often give people news they don’t want to hear, and I’ve learnt that how I listen matters as much as what I say.
In April 2026 I had to phone the owner of a small transport business to say his accreditation renewal would be refused unless he sent missing safety records within 14 days. He had already received two letters, and when I introduced myself he said we were trying to put him out of business and he would hang up.
I asked for two minutes to explain how I could help, and he agreed. I let him talk without interrupting, then summarised what I’d heard: his office manager, who kept the records, had left, and he didn’t know what we needed. I apologised that our letters hadn’t been clear, walked him through the three missing records with examples of what would count, and asked which would be hardest to find. I emailed him the list straight after the call, booked a follow-up for the next week, and told my supervisor about the problem with our letter.
He sent all three records within nine days and his accreditation was renewed. Our standard letter now lists the exact records needed and gives a contact name.
- Interpersonal skill is shown as actions: asking for time, listening without interrupting, summarising back.
- It matches the APS 4 ILS behaviour of understanding others by listening and asking clarifying questions.
- It holds firm on the requirement while changing how it is explained.
Mistakes to avoid
- Answering “written and verbal” with an example that only covers writing.
- Listing what you write (“emails, letters, reports”) without showing one piece of work.
- Claiming excellent communication in long, jargon-heavy sentences.
- Leaving out who the audience was and why they were hard to reach.
- Ending with “it went well” instead of what the reader or listener then did.
Check or draft your own response
Paste your response to see which parts of the criterion it proves, or paste rough notes for a draft built only from your own facts. Free, no account.
Questions
Do I need separate examples for written and verbal communication?
If the criterion names both, answer both. A short example for each is clearest, though one example can work if it genuinely shows both.
What counts as written communication if I don’t write reports?
Anything written for a reader with a purpose. South Australia’s sample response uses letters, memos, short reports and an induction leaflet. Say who read it and what happened next.
Which NSW capability covers negotiation?
Influence and negotiate. Communicate effectively covers clear communication, listening and writing. If a NSW role lists both among its focus capabilities, plan a separate example for each.
Is interpersonal the same as communication?
They overlap, but interpersonal criteria are about one-to-one relationships: listening, tact and handling conflict. South Australia’s guidance groups interpersonal with verbal communication, so a tense conversation like example 4 often suits both.
Sources
- NSW Government (Office of the Public Service Commissioner): The NSW Public Sector Capability Framework, Version 3 (2026)
- I work for NSW (NSW Government): Writing your application
- Australian Public Service Commission: Integrated Leadership System (ILS) APS 4 profile
- Australian Public Service Commission: Integrated Leadership System (ILS) APS 6 profile
- Australian Government Style Manual: Quick guide: plain language
- I WORK FOR SA (Government of South Australia): Addressing selection criteria
- Jobs and Skills WA (Government of Western Australia): Responding to selection criteria
- The University of Queensland Careers Service: Answering questions (structuring responses for applications and interviews)
- The Australian National University: Examples of selection criteria
General guidance. Always follow what the job ad or information pack asks for.